Surah al Kafirun, the first of the Four Quls, denounces the objects of
worship by the disbelievers, while at the same time affirms the “One” worshipped
by the believers.
What might this “object” be, the One worshipped
by the believers?
The answer comes in the second of the Four Quls, Surah al Ikhlas.
“Say, He is Allah, the One and Only,” the Surah
opens. The Surah then elaborates this One
and Only God with three other short verses.
And that completes it, making it one of the shortest chapters in the
Quran.
Yet, its standing in the Quran is “valued” as if
it is a third of the whole Quran, as authentic Hadith (Tradition) by al Bukhari
indicates.
Now, consider this point. The standardized Uthmani copy of the Quran contains
604 pages, with 15 lines every page, and, excluding the normal Bismillah which is not part of the
Surah, this Surah barely occupies two lines.
Two lines out of 604 pages of 15 lines per page, and yet its value is a
third of the whole Quran! That alone
indicates the importance of this Surah.
Surah al Ikhlas is considered a Makki surah, but, as Maudoodi has observed, there seem to be
some dispute about this fact, because some scholars seem to think that it was
revealed in Madinah.
The reason for the dispute is because some Traditions indicate that it was revealed during the Makkah period,
while others point to its revelation during the Madinah period.
In one tradition, for instance, Abdullah bin
Mas'ud has reported that the Quraysh said to the Holy Prophet (upon whom be peace):
"Tell us of the ancestry of your Lord." Thereupon this Surah was sent
down.
Jabir bin Abdullah has also stated that a Bedouin
said to the Holy Prophet: "Tell us of your Lord's ancestry." Thereupon
Allah sent down this Surah.
Both of the above Traditions clearly point to
the Makkah period.
One the other hand, there is also a tradition from
Ibn Abbas, saying that a group of the Jews came to the Holy Prophet and said:
"O Muhammad, tell us of the attributes of your Lord, who has sent you as a
Prophet." Thereupon Allah sent down this Surah.
Ibn Abbas has also related that a deputation of
the Christians of Najran along with seven priests visited the Holy Prophet, and
they said: "O Muhammad, tell us what is your Lord like and of what
substance He is made." The Holy
Prophet replied, "My Lord is not made from any substance. He is unique and
exalted above everything." Thereupon Allah sent down this Surah.
Yet in other Tradition, Dahhak, Qatadah and
Muqatil have stated that some Jewish rabbis came before the Holy Prophet, and
they said: "O Muhammad, tell us what is your Lord like, so that we may
believe in you. Allah in the Torah has sent down His description. Kindly tell
us of what He is made, what is His sex, whether He is made of gold, copper,
brass, iron, or silver, and whether He eats and drinks. Also tell us from whom
He has inherited the world, and who will inherit it after Him." Thereupon
Allah sent down this Surah.
Those three Traditions clearly point to Madinah
period.
Why are there so many contradictions, not only
regarding the periods, but also the “reasons” for its revelation?
In actual fact, there are no
contradictions. All those apparently
contradictory reports do not actually point to the reasons for its revelation,
but rather the responses made by the Prophet regarding the questions put to
him.
As we know, Quranic verses were revealed little
by little in stages, addressing specific event, question, challenge, problem, dilemma, accusation, etc.. Some were revealed
to console the Prophet, such as Surah ad Dhuha, others were revealed to console
the whole Islamic community under distress, such as Surah Yusuf, many others to respond to the challenge made by the
enemies, such as Surah al Kahfi.
Verses were also revealed to address specific
dilemma faced by the Prophet, such as his marriage with Zaynab bint Jash, who was then the wife of his adopted son, Zayd bin Haritha. A few verses were also revealed to clear the
good name of his young wife, Ayesha, who was being accused of infidelity.
Now, it is known that repeated revelations of
the same verses are unnecessary, because once revealed, the Prophet would
remember these by heart. His companions
would in turn put these into writing, and many would also memorize by hearts.
Likewise with Surah al Ikhlas. It was revealed but once, although the above Traditions
appear to suggest that it was revealed many times. All these apparent contradictions, however, can be
resolved with a very simple solution.
Take the phrase “therefore Allah sent down this Surah” in those Traditions, and replaces it
with “therefore the Prophet recited this Surah.” Do that and the whole contradictions are
vanished into the thin air.
Just
because the narrators of the Traditions say “therefore this Surah was revealed” does not mean that it was “actually”
revealed at that moment, or because of that particular event. It was merely their way of recording the
events that they had witnessed. And they had witnessed that, after those
questions were put to the Prophet, the latter responded by reciting Surah al
Ikhlas.
In short, therefore, all those contradictions do not exist in the first place. On the contrary, those various ahadith only point to the weight of this Surah, which was used many times to address many different questions asked in different occasions, unlike other verses or Surah which are used only once or twice.
In short, therefore, all those contradictions do not exist in the first place. On the contrary, those various ahadith only point to the weight of this Surah, which was used many times to address many different questions asked in different occasions, unlike other verses or Surah which are used only once or twice.
Looking from that light, it is not surprising
that the Prophet put a greater value on this short Surah as compared to others.
Of far greater value, of course, must have come
from its meaning. Taking the above
quoted Traditions as the backgrounds, we shall try to look into some of its
meanings in the next instalments, insyaAllah, but to conclude this first part,
let’s see whether it is a Makki or a Madani Surah.
That this is a Makki Surah is well established. In all likelihood, it is also among the
earliest surahs being revealed to the Prophet.
As Maudoodi puts it, “another proof of this Surah's being one of the
earliest surahs to be revealed is that when in Makkah Umayyah bin Khalaf, the
master of Hadrat Bilal, made him lie down on burning sand and placed a heavy
stone on his chest, Bilal used to cry "Ahad, Ahad!" This word was
derived from this very Surah.”
Maudoodi’s keen observation is of some validity
here. Although the word “Ahad” was
already in the Arabic vocabulary, it is highly unlikely that Bilal would utter
that word to mean “Allah” when being tortured had the Surah not been
revealed. He would have uttered “Allah, Allah”
instead.
Since Bilal was tortured during the fourth year
of Muhammad’s prophethood (or thereabout), this Surah must have been revealed
earlier.
End of Part 1
Assalamualaikum Sir
ReplyDeleteAfter reading your enlightening articles on 1st two Quls, I think it is best for Tauhid lesson in multi-religious country to begin with Tafsir on Surah Al Kafiruun to be followed by Al Ikhlas.Then only proceed with (for born Muslims) lesson on Attributes of ALLAH or Asmaul Husna.
As for Converts/Reverts, the flow is to begin with Tafsir on Surah Al Ikhlas to be followed with Prophethood of Muhammad (s.a.w) being the Cornerstone of Islamic Faith. Then only proceed with Articles of Faith.
Waalaikumussalam,
DeleteYou got a point there. Even if not followed in that order, both surah al Kafirun and al Ikhlas are indispensable in learning the tauhid.