tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post7549112653259912590..comments2024-03-02T10:48:48.293+08:00Comments on Commentary On Seerah And History: Curious Tale of Prophet Muhammad’s Love Affair with Umm HaniSM Derishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13968496258475420465noreply@blogger.comBlogger21125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-20399213717884655242021-09-16T14:57:21.238+08:002021-09-16T14:57:21.238+08:00Funny youre emphasising on "First Love" ...Funny youre emphasising on "First Love" and "madly in love" where even if it wqs neither, the argument that Mohd made up the mairaj story when he got caught in hanis bed Holds.<br /><br />Suppose Muhammad proposed hani for the First time before marrying Khadija.<br /><br />Mohd age: 25<br />Hani age: 5<br /><br />Talib rejected it. And no, despite of love, parents still reject marriages, even today.<br /><br />Now second proposal<br /><br />Mohd: 60<br />Hani: 40 with children under 10 years of age.<br /><br />So Its possible that hani had children when she was 30 who are still not mature when hani is 40.<br /><br />The third proposal was rejected by mohd prolly cuz he not into oldies.<br /><br />As for mohd being a pervert, he married ayesha when she was 6 and he was 50 plus,<br /><br />So there is no reason to believe that Mohd at 25 would've lusted for a 5 year old hani. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-40559251096083225272021-06-14T06:36:43.040+08:002021-06-14T06:36:43.040+08:00MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK,FATHER OF MODERN TURKEY CALL...MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK,FATHER OF MODERN TURKEY CALLED ISLAM AS THE ABSURD THEOLOGY OF AN IMMORAL BEDUINE.IF MOHAMMAD AT AGE 51 MARRY A CHILD OF 6 AND ENTER HER VAGINA WHEN SHE REACHES <br />9 THEN YOU CAN EXPECT ANY THING FROM SUCH A PERSON.HE EVEN SLEPT HIS DEAD AUNT FATIMA WHICH LEGALLY ALLOWS IN EGYPT TO HAVE SEX WITH YOUR DEAD WIFE WITHIN 6 HOURS OF HER DEATH.NO WONDER MUSLIM COUNTRIES HAVE BLASPHEMY LAWS TO HIDE THE TRUTH.balamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06581233517465933700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-17148934353688243612019-12-28T04:47:34.212+08:002019-12-28T04:47:34.212+08:00Allah o akbar !! Never does ever our prophet can d...Allah o akbar !! Never does ever our prophet can do anything of the sort .may Allah guide the one who wrote all this. Please dont quote such words of enemies of islam .our prophet is beloved to us muslims .pleass dont hurt our sentiments .our prophet is rehmat .none of the prophet can indulge in such act and create stories of their own .Allah o akbar !! Anumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12517421783118777376noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-40346963390522228032019-05-23T10:07:47.654+08:002019-05-23T10:07:47.654+08:00That the Prophet visited the house, this seems est...That the Prophet visited the house, this seems established by the tradition. As to the possibility that he visited his auntie, sharing her grief for recently losing her husband, this is also very possible. In any case, regardless of the purpose of the visit, not even his enemies in those days think that Muhammad went there to have sex with his cousin. Such a thing did not even cross their fertile and imaginative minds. <br /><br />Even the hostile orientalists who consider the Prophet's marriage to his other cousin (Zaynab) to be scandalous, do not concoct such a story about Muhammad and his cousin Umm Hani. SM Derishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13968496258475420465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-22652370202560324622019-05-01T10:52:05.750+08:002019-05-01T10:52:05.750+08:00Sir,
Had Muhammad (SAW) indeed visited a house, a...Sir,<br /><br />Had Muhammad (SAW) indeed visited a house, any chance that it was primarily to meet Fatimah Binti Asad who shared the same grief following the demise of Abu Talib?<br /><br />May Allah bless you to continue writing Seerah; a legacy not many have the in-depth knowledge, wisdom and talent as you are.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-66521718314339151822018-07-01T13:59:22.621+08:002018-07-01T13:59:22.621+08:00You are a true mujahid of Islam. I don't have ...You are a true mujahid of Islam. I don't have words to praise you.....Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17571257196708539807noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-9419655014916304852018-03-11T13:48:01.563+08:002018-03-11T13:48:01.563+08:00your argument about umme hani's age is pretty ...your argument about umme hani's age is pretty absurd, that she must've been reaching menopause by 40 etc. khadijah married the prophet in her 40s and went on to have his children. so menopause is out of question in this case. as a muslim, i know my prophet couldnt have done what the allegations suggest. likewise, kindly use sound proof to support your response to the allegation rather than the ones you've written here. thank you.doodlepimhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13338943296695396241noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-26504464180102278692015-12-28T22:15:27.415+08:002015-12-28T22:15:27.415+08:00Utterly and absolutely Wrong!Utterly and absolutely Wrong!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00432235974334536670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-82182584356940325072015-12-28T22:14:31.780+08:002015-12-28T22:14:31.780+08:00Utterly and absolutely Wrong!Utterly and absolutely Wrong!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00432235974334536670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-21149358431795449212015-09-17T15:31:01.742+08:002015-09-17T15:31:01.742+08:00As for the empirical evidence, no seerah book, nor...As for the empirical evidence, no seerah book, nor authentic hadith, ever mentions the affair between Muhammad the Prophet and his cousin, Umm Hani, although Muhammad's private life is extensively covered in the Quran, the seerah books and the hadith collections. The above writer makes the allegation without quoting any of those references. The reason: because there is none. Yet he dares to say that Muhammad continued his adulterous episode with Umm Hani even after he failed to marry her.<br /><br />The writer probably comes across a tradition stating that during the Night Journey, the Prophet was at the house of Umm Hani. The writer seizes this opportunity, saying that the Night Journey never took place, but only a concoction by Muhammad because he was caught having sex with Umm Hani. But who caught them? If truly that is the case, why did the Prophet took three years to migrate. Would not his followers be seriously alarmed by this affair, on the ground that Muhammad breaks his own teaching, engaging in cardinal sin himself. <br /><br />The writer says after the affair was leaked out, he migrated. After three years? Come on. So he was caught but everything was kept secret? Who caught him? Who leaked it out after three years? If it was kept secret, why the need to concoct the Night Journey episode, which he declared to the people in Makkah next day. One has to be a total ignoramus to believe in such an allegation. Even an ignorant Muslim would not buy such a story, on account that it contradicts the very nature of Muhammad being the Prophet.<br /><br />But as for Umm Hani being Muhammad's first love, this is not a matter to do with Prophethood. I write what I believe based on what I know. If I am right, then I am right; if I am wrong, then I am only human, not free from making mistake. It is just that based on evidences available, such a case seems highly remote to me. If someone can come up with clear evidence that she is indeed his first love, then so be it. It does not really matter one way or another. <br /><br />But to suggest that Muhammad had an adulterous relationship with her, then it is a different matter altogether.<br /><br />I think I have written too long already on this matter. It is not my policy to engage in senseless allegation like this. But I take it for granted that you have genuine concern, and for that you deserve some response.<br /><br />(2/2)SM Derishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13968496258475420465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-29462911384417667462015-09-17T15:29:40.398+08:002015-09-17T15:29:40.398+08:00Dear brother Irshad,
I take that your concern is ...Dear brother Irshad,<br /><br />I take that your concern is genuine, and going by your name, you are a Muslim. <br /><br />Now, a Muslim is only a Muslim if he testifies that "There is no God but Allah, and that Muhammad is God's Messenger." <br /><br />Meaning, no man can consider himself a Muslim unless he testifies (not only accepts) that Muhammad is Allah's Messenger. And no Muslim worth his salt would even dare to think that God's Messenger can be an adulterer, for that not only insult the Prophet, but more importantly, it is an insult to Allah Himself. Adultery is one of the major sins. Would Allah be so low as to choose an adulterer to be His chosen Messenger, to carry out His message to be the Guide to the mankind? Can't you see how ridiculous the whole things are.<br /><br />For that matter, the above is sufficient reason to dismiss the allegation without further argument. It is for that reason that I dismiss the allegation outright. I quote the story only to allude to the named person in the baseless story, who is a good woman herself. And to show how low the enemies of Islam would stoop.<br /><br />In your original posting, you said, "In your eyes, the prophet might be a great man, but for umm Haani who might have seen him since childhood and also very well knows who he is from the episode of meraj, she could have simply refused." <br /><br />Now my friend, if you think carefully of the implication of what what you write, then you should know that Umm Hani was "the willing partner" in the alleged passionate affair, making her an adulterer as well. Unless if you consider her unwilling. But if she was an unwilling partner, then the Prophet is not only an adulterer, but a rapist as well, God forbids.<br /><br />All the above made me dismissive of your comment, not wanting to say anything more.<br /><br />In short, the allegation needs not be entertained because it is against the very nature of Prophethood, and against the character of the Prophet himself. A Prophet must be chaste; an adulterer is not. <br /><br />(1/2)SM Derishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13968496258475420465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-86351799560412691472015-09-17T10:36:07.139+08:002015-09-17T10:36:07.139+08:00I am not a person who simply blindly argue with pe...I am not a person who simply blindly argue with people. I genuinely wanted to know if the allegations are true or false. You know there is an allegation and you have already decided to refute it by putting in your blogpost. Is it not necessary that your refutation have to be based on evidence? Your arguments are purely assumptions and I need to know what are the real reasons that this particular allegation is false. Irshadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02944691558825305581noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-75229714047852570252015-09-16T12:36:19.949+08:002015-09-16T12:36:19.949+08:00Since you appear to believe in the alleged adulter...Since you appear to believe in the alleged adulterous episode, I will not condescend myself to say anything more.SM Derishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13968496258475420465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-5460190704226119032015-09-16T10:36:33.467+08:002015-09-16T10:36:33.467+08:00The reason for refutation is absurd. The first th...The reason for refutation is absurd. The first thing you say is how can the prophet marry someone quite young. If he can marry Ayisha when she was only 6 years old, why can't he marry umm Haani who could be older? Second reason you have quoted is why did she refuse to marry when he proposed again. How can this be a reason? In your eyes, the prophet might be a great man, but for umm Haani who might have seen him since childhood and also very well knows who he is from the episode of meraj, she could have simply refused. Irshadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02944691558825305581noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-58072534922215006742015-08-03T19:41:55.483+08:002015-08-03T19:41:55.483+08:00Most welcome.Most welcome.SM Derishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13968496258475420465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-65177847493227767452015-07-31T20:43:44.888+08:002015-07-31T20:43:44.888+08:00Thank younsir for the detailed unbiased report.
I ...Thank younsir for the detailed unbiased report.<br />I was searching for um.hani while reading had is in English. I would say the details internet is dangerous. Thank God that He led me to your blog<br />Jazakallah khairshuja.shaherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15639355252509940524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-64853477883037361322015-05-08T13:57:49.652+08:002015-05-08T13:57:49.652+08:00wrongwrongAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-71299973510186831502014-09-17T22:23:54.566+08:002014-09-17T22:23:54.566+08:00Really? I thought electronic cigarette has no fire...Really? I thought electronic cigarette has no fire. How little I know.SM Derishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13968496258475420465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-34974207410697542732014-09-17T21:15:45.061+08:002014-09-17T21:15:45.061+08:00There is never SMOKE without FIRE!!!There is never SMOKE without FIRE!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-27251866563926194252013-05-09T13:01:39.567+08:002013-05-09T13:01:39.567+08:00Thanks for the suggestion my friend, but when the ...Thanks for the suggestion my friend, but when the idea presented is too ridiculous, such as the one mooted by faithfreedom.org, we do not need to waste our time answering them. Suffice to point out the matter in hand, present the actual fact, and caution the Muslims of the malice behind the ridiculous piece of rubbish.<br /><br />Besides, I am too old to entertain such nonsense.SM Derishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13968496258475420465noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2304369412849298861.post-29715104375871230252013-05-09T12:44:32.501+08:002013-05-09T12:44:32.501+08:00Then you need to counter the faith freedom people....Then you need to counter the faith freedom people.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com